0 of 10 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 10 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Which of the following is NOT a factor that should be considered when determining fall distance calculation?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Dealing with the uncertainty and unpredictability of personal injury, property loss, business interruption, and liability is identified with:”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Strict liability places the responsibility upon the manufacturer because:”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Which of the following industries experience the highest frequency of fall-related deaths?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Most fall injuries are caused by falls ______.”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
What should one do to help make sure a fall protection program is effective?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Who is responsible for making sure fall protection equipment is used properly?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
At what height are guardrails required for scaffolds?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
Using the hierarchy of controls, which hazard control method should be considered first to reduce or eliminate risk?”
“The project manager involved in Etobicoke’s deadly scaffolding collapse has been sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison. The supervisor was found guilty of four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily injury. Four workers fell 13 storeys to their deaths that day when the swing scaffolding, they were working on snapped in half and collapsed. None were connected to a safety lifeline. One employee, who was not secured properly to his lifeline, clung briefly to the broken equipment before falling and suffering broken legs and a broken spine. A sixth worker, who was properly connected to his harness, survived unharmed. The project manager testified in court that the supervisor didn’t insist crew members be attached to lifelines. He also testified the supervisor asked him to lie about the incident afterward. The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), which launched a “Kill a Worker, Go to Jail” campaign immediately after the tragedy, called the sentencing decision for the supervisor “historic” and noted that “this supervisor’s conviction and sentencing is the first of its kind in Ontario.”
Holding workplace supervisors criminally responsible for harm on the job is a provision added to the Criminal Code in 2004 and can result in jail time.
When should fall protection equipment be inspected?”